![]() ![]() Method Comparative case studies were conducted in two well-established large open source communities, Mozilla and Python, which engage extremely different types of users. Objective This paper investigates differences of peer review practices across different open source software communities, especially the ones engage distinct types of users, in order to offer contextualized guidance for developing open source software projects. ![]() A universal solution is likely to fail for communities with varying characteristics. As communities grow to a certain extent, how to organize and support the peer review process becomes increasingly challenging. Context The power of open source software peer review lies in the involvement of virtual communities, especially users who typically do not have a formal role in the development process. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |